ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Inclusion of Compatible Pairs in the Australian Paired Kidney Exchange Program

E. van Hardeveld1, S. McGinn2, L. Cantwell3, M. Kummrow3, P. Hughes1

1Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne,Victoria, Australia, 2Nephrology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 3Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne,Victoria, Australia

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: B295

Keywords: Kidney transplantation

Session Information

Session Name: Poster Session B: Kidney Paired Exchange

Session Type: Poster Session

Date: Sunday, June 2, 2019

Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

 Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm

Location: Hall C & D

*Purpose: The Australian paired kidney exchange (AKX) program allows the inclusion of compatible pairs (CP) to allow improved immunological matching. Previous modelling showed that inclusion of CP would allow improved matching for poorly matched pairs and increased rates of transplantation for incompatible pairs in the pool. We report the experience with CP during 2017-2018.

*Methods: Data on CP was extracted from the AKX database and the Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Eplet mismatches were calculated using HLA matchmaker v2.1.

*Results: Seventeen pairs were considered to be compatible out of 159 involved in match runs over this time. Characteristics of the recipients who were considered as compatible pairs are shown in figure 1. The reasons that recipients were entered into AKX are shown in table 1. The average age of recipients in CP was 41.5 years although those entered solely due to poor eplet matching were younger (31.9 years). Sixteen of the 17 recipients were transplanted in AKX, the remaining one was offered a match but declined it due to the presence of a very low level DSA and then proceeded with a direct live donor transplant. Of those who were transplanted in AKX, 14 received their offer in the first match run while 2 received it in the second. Of those who were transplanted in the AKX, those that began with poor matching with their original donor (groups 1,2,4) had better matching with the matched donor (Table 2). No improvement in elet matching was seen in the other groups. Two recipients accepted a kidney from a donor against whom they had low level DSAs. Two different recipients accepted a kidney from an ABO incompatible donor. Those transplanted in AKX were in 13 separate chains which included 42 incompatible pairs. Of these 15 had a cPRA>90% and 5 had a cPRA>97%.

*Conclusions: A range of pairs entered into paired exchange programs can be considered to be compatible. In the AKX the majority of those entered received an offer in the first match run. Those entered due to poor eplet matching typically received a kidney from a better matched donor. Compatible pairs might facilitate increased matching in a paired exchange program including in highly sensitised incompatible pairs.

Table 1. Reasons for entry into AKX.
Group Reason for entry into AKX Number of pairs Average age of recipients
1 High level of eplet mismatch 7 31.9
2 High level of eplet mismatch with low level DSA 5 40.6
3 Repeat mismatch without detectable DSA 2 60
4 Male to female partner with previous pregnancy, low level DSA and high eplet mismatch 2 48
5 Altruism 1 64
Table 2. Number of eplet mismatches with original donor and matched donor.
Mean total number of mismatched eplets with original donor Mean total number of mismatched eplets with matched donor Mean reduction in total eplet mismatch
1 High level of eplet mismatch 78.7 38.3 41.3
2 High level of eplet mismatch with low level DSA 78.8 56.2 22.6
3 Repeat mismatch without detectable DSA 28.5 62.5 -34
4 Male to female partner with previous pregnancy, low level DSA and high eplet mismatch 77.5 32.5 45
5 Altruism 50 50 0

 border=

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hardeveld Evan, McGinn S, Cantwell L, Kummrow M, Hughes P. Inclusion of Compatible Pairs in the Australian Paired Kidney Exchange Program [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/inclusion-of-compatible-pairs-in-the-australian-paired-kidney-exchange-program/. Accessed May 18, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences