ATC Abstracts

American Transplant Congress abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2022 American Transplant Congress
    • 2021 American Transplant Congress
    • 2020 American Transplant Congress
    • 2019 American Transplant Congress
    • 2018 American Transplant Congress
    • 2017 American Transplant Congress
    • 2016 American Transplant Congress
    • 2015 American Transplant Congress
    • 2013 American Transplant Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
    • 2021 Resources
    • 2016 Resources
      • 2016 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2016 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2015-2016
      • AST Board of Directors 2015-2016
    • 2015 Resources
      • 2015 Welcome Letter
      • ATC 2015 Program Planning Committees
      • ASTS Council 2014-2015
      • AST Board of Directors 2014-2015
      • 2015 Conference Schedule
  • Search

Living Donor Conversion Rates as a Quality Measure for Kidney Program Efficiency for Both New Referrals and Existing Listed Candidates

E. Woodle1, C. Siemers2, B. Woodle3, C. King2, R. Alloway1, S. Tremblay1

1U of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 2UC Health, Cincinnati, OH, 3U of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR

Meeting: 2019 American Transplant Congress

Abstract number: 130

Keywords: Kidney transplantation

Session Information

Session Name: Concurrent Session: Kidney Living Donor: Quality and Selection

Session Type: Concurrent Session

Date: Sunday, June 2, 2019

Session Time: 4:30pm-6:00pm

 Presentation Time: 5:42pm-5:54pm

Location: Ballroom A

*Purpose: Arguably the most important achievement for renal failure patients is identification of a living donor (LD)and transplantation with a LD kidney. Given these considerations LD conversion rate (LDCR) has been previously reported as a potential quality metric for kidney transplant programs. Herein, we expand upon this concept with increased specificity by calculating LDCR for recently referred kidney transplant candidates (viz, by determining LDCR for new wait listings (ie, waiting times < 1 year) and also for existing waitlisted patients (ie, waiting times > 1 year). The UNOS requirement that all kidney transplant recipients be wait listed prior to transplantation has greatly increased the integrity of data used to calculate these rates. Herein we examine these new concepts.

*Methods: OPTN/SRTR data was used for all calculations. Formulae used to calculate New Listing LDCR (NL-LDCR) was #LD kidney transplants with < 1 year waiting time in most recent year/# new wait listings in the same year for each kidney transplant program. Existing listing LDCR (EL-LDCR) was calculated using #LD with >1 year waiting time/#wait listed patients at the beginning of the year.

*Results: Figure 1 presents data for over 260 US kidney transplant programs for NL-LDCR and EL-LDCR. Marked variability in NL-LDCR was observed amongst programs varying from 0% to almost 60%. EL-LDCR demonstrated a 1-2 log lower rate of LDCR (between 0 -20%), and with a lesser degree of heterogeneity amongst transplant programs. Finally, regression analysis examining the relationship between NL-LDCR and EL-LDCR for individual programs demonstrated a relatively low correlation rate (r=0.34) that was significant however,, indicating heterogeneity in processes for achieving LD transplantation involve differing processes.

*Conclusions: Kidney transplant program efficiency at achieving LD transplantation can now be measured by two approaches- NL-LDCR and EL-LDCR that show significant heterogeneity amongst US programs, indicating substantial room for growth in many programs. Importantly, achieving LD transplantation in a newly referred patient is a different process that achieving LD transplantation in a chronically wait listed patient, and these data indicate that processes should be developed and widely adopted that help address the low LDCR in this population.

 border=

 border=

 border=

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Woodle E, Siemers C, Woodle B, King C, Alloway R, Tremblay S. Living Donor Conversion Rates as a Quality Measure for Kidney Program Efficiency for Both New Referrals and Existing Listed Candidates [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2019; 19 (suppl 3). https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/living-donor-conversion-rates-as-a-quality-measure-for-kidney-program-efficiency-for-both-new-referrals-and-existing-listed-candidates/. Accessed May 18, 2025.

« Back to 2019 American Transplant Congress

Visit Our Partner Sites

American Transplant Congress (ATC)

Visit the official site for the American Transplant Congress »

American Journal of Transplantation

The official publication for the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) »

American Society of Transplantation (AST)

An organization of more than 3000 professionals dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation. »

American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS)

The society represents approximately 1,800 professionals dedicated to excellence in transplantation surgery. »

Copyright © 2013-2025 by American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Preferences