Making Right Donor Nephrectomy Great Again: Evaluating Right Hand Assisted Retroperitoneal Donor Nephrectomy
1Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2Cell Biology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meeting: 2018 American Transplant Congress
Abstract number: C134
Keywords: Donation, Kidney transplantation, Laparoscopy
Session Information
Session Name: Poster Session C: Kidney Living Donor Issues
Session Type: Poster Session
Date: Monday, June 4, 2018
Session Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm
Presentation Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm
Location: Hall 4EF
Background: Living kidney transplant offers ideal therapy of end stage renal disease patients. A variety of minimal invasive techniques for donor nephrectomy have been described and practiced. Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneal Surgery (HARS) for left donor nephrectomy has been studied in the literature, however right HARS has little mention. The Aim of our study is to describe our two-instrument port right HARS procedure, review our own results and determine its safety and applicability.
Design and Methods: A retrospective, single center analysis. The test group was our first consecutive 25 cases of right HARS compared to a matched sample of left HARS in age, gender, number of arteries as per radiological findings and surgeon performing the donor surgeries performed within the same time period. Primary end-point was operative time. Other variables include body mass index, warm ischemia time, kidney size, working ports, status of peritoneum, conversion rate, estimated blood loss, blood transfusions, renal function at 3 and 90 days post-donation, complications within 30 days post-operative and hospital stay. Corresponding recipient graft function and surgical complications within 30 days of transplant were also reviewed.
Results: Baseline demographic data showed no statistical difference between the groups. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the right HARS group than the left HARS group (123.8min Vs. 153.72min) (p = 0.005) with all other parameters showing no statistically significant difference. Donor complications were stratified based on the Calvien-dindo Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index with no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.318). All donors showed adequate renal function at 3 and 90 days post-donation. Delayed graft function and urinary leak developed in 4 (16%) and 1 (4%) of the recipients of right HARS Vs. none in the controls (p = 0.110 and 0.990) respectively. All recipients from both groups showed adequate renal function by 90 days post-transplant excluding a single case that required transplant nephrectomy due to recurrence of deep vein thrombosis extending to the graft.
Conclusion: HARS techniques for right donor nephrectomy is safe and applicable within the scope of kidney donation.
CITATION INFORMATION: Alahdal H., Alghamdi F., Shoukri M., Brockmann J., Broering D. Making Right Donor Nephrectomy Great Again: Evaluating Right Hand Assisted Retroperitoneal Donor Nephrectomy Am J Transplant. 2017;17 (suppl 3).
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Alahdal H, Alghamdi F, Shoukri M, Brockmann J, Broering D. Making Right Donor Nephrectomy Great Again: Evaluating Right Hand Assisted Retroperitoneal Donor Nephrectomy [abstract]. https://atcmeetingabstracts.com/abstract/making-right-donor-nephrectomy-great-again-evaluating-right-hand-assisted-retroperitoneal-donor-nephrectomy/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2018 American Transplant Congress